Binary only drivers can be reengineder by disassembling them. And they
are
not a prerequsite for keeping the real intrinsics closed. One could as
well
write the driver in such a kind of C (possibly automatically generated
:-)
That it could as well be quite comparable to some kind of assembler.
(function names like f0001(x,y,z) and such...). This would still leave
the
possiblity to fix some basic minor kernel interface issues on demand.
> >Binary compatibility killed windows
> >Windows 98 could have been a much nicer OS without back compatibility. I see
> >no reason to kill Linux by re-enacting proprietary OS history with a free
> >OS.
>
> Well, windows is still alive B-). I have been looking a TV by using
> a Matrox Marvel TV on Win 98. When Matrox would write a driver for LINUX ?
> The answer is NEVER B-(((. And I did not hear about a publication of full
> specification of that card ( May be I am not right here ).
>
> > Alan
> Sergey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Marcin Dalecki- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/