Re: Ext2 defragmentation

Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Sun, 14 Nov 1999 19:08:06 +0000 (GMT)


On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Folkert van Heusden wrote:

> > Of course, since ext2 is resistent to fragmentation, it is questionable
>
> Is it?
> I do not really call 17.4% relatively unfragmented :)

You've never administered an NT box, then :)

> (/dev/hdb1: 16597/1024000 files (17.4% non-contiguous), 580761/1024001
> blocks)

Ted T'so has said that the fsck fragmentation stats are fairly bogus
anyway.

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/