Re: [Patch] shm bug introduced with pagecache in 2.3.11

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Fri, 12 Nov 1999 04:09:24 -0800 (PST)


On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Manfred wrote:
>
> I don't like the semaphore, because (AFAICS, I'm only looking at the diff)
> you single-thread the swapin code (per-segment, but still single thread)

I think the semaphore is a good idea, if only because it makes things much
more obviously correct - exactly because of the clear serialization. And I
don't think the serialization is a performance problem, because by the
time you start paging we're not talking about high performance shared
memory anyway, and because it's per-segment it is notgoing to make
"system" performance any worse.

In fact, my reaction to the semaphore is "do we actually need the
spinlock any more"?

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/