Re: question: spinlocks and userspace.

Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Wed, 10 Nov 1999 18:01:31 +0100 (CET)


On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> >additionally: if the data structure is never accessed from IRQ handlers
> >then it's fast and safe to use a semaphore instead of a spinlock.
>
> You can access it also from irq handlers but you are allowed to use only
> down_trylock(). (a similar things happens in show_buffers() in buffer.c
> but with spinlocks)

yep you are right. This technique can be used for event-driven state
machines, but cannot be used if the IRQ _must_ get access to that data
structure. Ie. show_buffers() is fine, because the worst that can happen
is that we do not see a debugging message.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/