Re: Intel E1000 server gig-card?

Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch)
26 Oct 1999 17:33:07 +0200


>>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie Lokier <lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> writes:

Jamie> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> writes:
>>
Jeff> If it really matters to you, you can always dual-license the
Jeff> code, and let downstream developers pick which license they find
Jeff> most suitable.
>> Thats actually a bad approach IMHO, I would be willing to dual
>> license certain bits of code. However, when doing so I would also
>> put a strong encouragement statement in the code suggesting people
>> to also dual license their changes.

Jamie> There's not much point dual licensing with BSD and GPL. It's
Jamie> equivalent to the BSD license alone, so why be confusing about
Jamie> it?

Because you want to make the point that you are a GPL person, but
trying to be nice so the BSD people can use it as well. But right, it
made more sense when BSD had the silly advertising clause.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/