Re: locking question: do_mmap(), do_munmap()

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 23:23:54 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT), kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com
(Kanoj Sarcar) said:

>> What about something like a rw-semaphore which protects the vma list:
>> vma-list modifiers [ie merge_segments(), insert_vm_struct() and
>> do_munmap()] grab it exclusive, swapper grabs it "shared, starve
>> exclusive".
>> All other vma-list readers are protected by mm->mmap_sem.

> I have tried to follow most of the logic and solutions proposed
> on this thread.

It will deadlock.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/