RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 15:14:29 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) )"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: More on bigger kdev_t"

On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Having to have a configuration file for permissions is not a good
> thing. Permissions go with files, they don't go in a config file somewhere.

Would my devfs persistence proposal (/dev/devfs.permissions) be
acceptable? No userspace daemon needed. No config file needed.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) )"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: More on bigger kdev_t"