>One last comment: as far as I can tell, most people aren't against devfs,
>they are against the current implementation. The basic idea is useful at
>some level. If that is correct, perhaps you're all arguing about nothing
>(not that I've ever done that; sigh).
Well, the best way to fix the implementation would then be to
include it in 2.3.x and let the legion of kernel hackers fix the
problems with it.
____
david parsons \bi/ I wish there was a devfs for 2.0.<29 so I
\/ could be using it in non-test kernels.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/