>This is why I suggested losing the devfs FILESYSTEM but retaining what
>is devfs's INTENTION. Use the existing devfsd to maintain nodes on the
>disk. Most of the benefits are kept. Some problems are addressed.
Removing the filesystem makes devfs completely useless.
____
david parsons \bi/ Just what I'd want: a ``devfs'' that renders your
\/ machine unusable if the user-space daemon dumps core.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/