Re: 2.3.18ac9 doesn't detect tulip (again!)

Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@sonera.fi)
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:33:28 +0300

On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 03:02:33AM -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> I looked into this problem again after appearance of 2.3.18ac9 (BTW, the
> EXTRAVERSION in the ac9 patch still says ac8). I didn't have any luck,
> but, by increasing debug levels, I found what I hope is a clue for my
> betters.

Maybe, maybe not.

Show us the result of: cat /proc/iomem
about the range data for 21041 chip.

> dmesg output after increasing debug level for 2.3.18ac9:
>
> Found 3c900 Boomerang 10baseT at PCI address 0xec00, IRQ 11.
> Found Digital DC21041 Tulip at PCI address 0xea000000, IRQ 11.
>
> dmesg output from 2.2.12
> eth0: 3Com 3c900 Boomerang 10baseT at 0xec00, 00:10:4b:b3:8a:92, IRQ 11
> eth1: Digital DC21041 Tulip at 0xe800, 21041 mode, 00 c0 f0 37 22 56,
> IRQ 11.
>
> Is the 0xe800 vs 0xea00 significant? I'm clueless here.

The addresses are IO: 0xe800 vs. MEM: 0xea000000
they are of DIFFERENT IO facilities.

/Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/