That'll be nice on a 4Mb palmtop.
> I believe it doesn't worth to save 200k of RAM and to go slow (note
> the binary image won't bloat as the hash is allocated in the .bss
> section).
I don't believe we can go around throwing 200K of ram away. A few of those
and its starting to bite 16-32Mb boxes.
Please look at DaveM's hash patches for 2.2.x
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/