>>> It should be a priority to merge knfsd patches quickly in order
>>> to eliminate this big ugly mess and finally get to a state where
>>> sysadmin can use NFS with Linux without loosing their sleep.
>> I don't normally join in with "me too"'s, but knfsd is a sore
>> subject with me. I'll accept that Linus may not want Trond's
>> nfs3 patches at this point, but the stock client code is
>> workable as-is for v2 (though somewhat slower). The server is
>> another story entirely.
> OK, can't help it anymore... I have to join this "me too" ;-)
>> Linus, Alan, can we please just take the step of putting HJ's
>> patches into the mainstream kernel, or failing that communicate
>> clearly what you object to? The current state of affairs is just
>> not acceptable, IMHO.
> Pretty please?
Is this the reason why my RedHat 6.0 system accepts NFS when run with
the 2.2.5-22 kernel, but not when I compile 2.2.10 and run under that?
If so, then...
1. I'm a "me too" as well.
2. What can I do to get it working until such time as the patches
in question do go into the stock kernel?
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/Linux/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/