Re: Still need help on kernel issue!

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 00:20:23 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brian Swetland: "Re: scsi, round robin && mailbox ?"
Previous message: david parsons: "Re: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports..."

> ifdefed out during the compiling. The reason for it is when I include
> asm/smp.h and asm/spinlock.h for SMP support, compiler complained a lot of
> undefined symbols in those included files and failed. So I did not using
> that because I thought the spin_lock functions is for MP system only.

They turn into cli and sti on non SMP chips. So that would explain it.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brian Swetland: "Re: scsi, round robin && mailbox ?"
Previous message: david parsons: "Re: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports..."