Re: CONFIG_BIGMEM and rawio

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 22:15:37 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

On Fri, 3 Sep 1999 19:14:09 +0200 (CEST), Andrea Arcangeli
<andrea@suse.de> said:

> On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>> the IO for write, after the IO for read. Nobody else has to know. We
>> already implement bounce buffers underneath the ll_rw_block interface
>> for some ISA devices and it works just fine.

> If I understood well you want to do the copy of only of the current
> req->bh and not of all the list of bh queued following the
> req->bh->b_reqnext pointer.

Yes. We already have per-bh completion callbacks, so there's no need
(or desire) to wait for the whole request chain to complete.

> So you are supposing that only the DMA lowlevel drivers are following
> the b_reqnext pointer.

How does that follow?

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/