Re: NFS under 2.2.12

Mark Hahn (hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca)
Thu, 2 Sep 1999 01:05:32 +0000 ( )


> design feature, it's simply a shortcoming that comes with the new design.

this seems pretty wimpy to me, since in the absolute worst case,
the nfs server just uses a hash table to map from random handles
onto whatever tuple is needed to specify the source block (dev:inode
or whatever). is this an issue only because handles are of a particular
size? I have a hard time imagining that the time or space overhead
of a hash entry per block would cause performance problems. ah, or is
it merely that handles should persist across server restarts?

> In the meantime, you do need to export all your filesystems explicitely,

this is a yucky workaround. it used to be a nice feature of Linux that
you could toss random disks onto a server, and have clients remain oblivious.

regards, mark hahn.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/