Re: Your backup is unsafe!

Wakko Warner (wakko@animx.eu.org)
Sun, 1 Aug 1999 20:03:33 -0400


Even if you backup a vfat partition when under wingdoze, what's to say that
restoring under wingdoze will produce the same short filenames? All of my
experiences have been that it's always ~1. As far as I care, vfat sucks
anyway.

> > Apperently the VFAT needs some more cleaning, I imagine when perfect the
> > short names will have no effect what so ever if the filesystem is mounted
> > as a VFAT partiton, the only way you'll be able to do anything with them
> > is with the SAMBA ioctls.
>
> Some @#$^ing programs apparently want to be able to access the files via
> short names.
>
> > The problem with linuxlfnbk (or rather I imagine it'd be a shortname backup)
> > is how do you restore the data ? There's no way to control the short name
> > VFAT uses is there ?
>
> As much as I hate such 'solutions' - add an ioctl() for munge-changing.
> Yes, adding ioctls stinks. But it's less PITA then playing games with
> dcache and screwing VFS for the sake of braindead monstrosity.
>
> > Possibility (3)
> > Ignore it, it's a windows problem :-) :-)
> >
> > (Scheesh! All these hoops just for gui-dos! :-) )
>
> Sounds fine with me.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/