Re: low priority soft RT?
yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:04:10 -0600
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote:
> > > What's wrong with simply promoting the SCHED_IDLE task to normal
> > > priority while it's in the kernel?
> >
> > You could just fix "goodness" to do a different calculation depending
> > on the process state.
>
> Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. It's so obvious, I'm surprised it
> hasn't come up before.
I think this is what Richard Gooch had in mind, but I was too dense to figure it out.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/