Re: low priority soft RT?

yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 08:20:34 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: low priority soft RT?"
Previous message: Heinz-Ado Arnolds: "fs/exec.c and binfmt-xxx"

On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 04:04:12PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote:
> > Someone, maybe it was Linus, pointed out that the current range of
> > "nice" levels is totally arbitrary and simply increasing the range
> > would do good.
>
> Unfortunately, we showed him he was wrong and the deadlock
> could still happen with normal timeslicing processes and
> RT tasks...

Can you tell me too?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: low priority soft RT?"
Previous message: Heinz-Ado Arnolds: "fs/exec.c and binfmt-xxx"