Re: low priority soft RT?

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:33:40 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:15:39 +0200 (CEST), Rik van Riel
<riel@nl.linux.org> said:

> Promotion to a higher scheduling class shouldn't be too
> difficult.

Sure, but when, exactly, will you do this? The condition I saw in your
latest SCHED_IDLE patches are insufficient for the long term. Testing
the lock_depth is not good enough: there are large parts of the VFS
which now run without the kernel spinlock, but which can still hold or
block on other resources (eg. page locks).

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/