Re: Measured overhead of timer interrupts

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 13:46:15 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:

> Hello!
>
> > Actually sysctl allows converting everything, if you just put in a pointer to
> > your own handling function [of course for ms it should be put into sysctl.c
> > as a generic mechanism]. proc_dointvec is just a default.
>
> He-he... Looking at do_proc_dointvec was enough for me to forget about
> idea to create our own private functions 8)8)
>
> BTW do you know that we used sysctl absolutely incorrectly?
> No sys/net variables define "strategy" method, hence sysctl() does not work
> at all. To be more exact, it does not any checks or transformations.
> Grr... What sad discovery... :( I make such discoveries not every day 8)
>
> Alexey

Alexey, before you will start any proc-related changes in net/*, could you
look through the patch partially cleaning up that stuff, OK? I'll dig it
out and port to the current kernel(s) - it should go both for 2.2 and 2.3.
Later,
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/