Re: low priority soft RT?

Bryn Paul Arnold Jones (bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk)
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:21:32 +0100 (GMT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 cd_smith@ou.edu wrote:

> Anyone thought about allowing soft RT (SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR) tasks with
> negative priorities? These would only be executed if no other tasks of
> any type are there. Giving a normal Linux task a niceness value won't do
> this, as the task will still get some CPU time.
>

So SCHED_IDLE then (only execute this if we would otherwise be executing
the idle task)? It's been talked about before, IIRC even implemented, it
just never got into the mainstream kernel.

Bryn
- --
Or words to that effect ...
PGP pubkeys from http://www.gytha.demon.co.uk/pubkey.asc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Comment: Silly comment here ...
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBN5co7t94IUtvfSqaEQIA+QCeJEqYSY3Bv7pwB1OYvKguKrvzkmoAoLbz
ZJ37LMPpt2KNkcw7lRPJVtcK
=nPOD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/