Re: Bad 2.3.10 + gdb interaction

Tim Waugh (tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:23:57 +0100 (GMT)


On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Tim Waugh wrote:

> By 'break', I mean that when processes (unrelated to gdb) execve they get
> sent SIGTRAP, even though they aren't PF_PTRACED. But it isn't coming
> from the obvious place in binfmt_elf.c, and in fact when
> do_load_elf_binary exits, current->signal is 0.

More information: the signal gets sent by int3. Could it be something
along the lines of POKE_MEM into a private mapping going wrong and the
change becoming visible to everyone? (Yes, I'm guessing wildly.)

Tim.
*/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/