Re: OOM

Claus Fischer (claus.fischer@intel.com)
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:38:07 -0700 (PDT)


On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Bernd Paysan wrote:

: I think Rik's algorithm is good enough and has the enormous advantage of
: being cost-free in normal operation (*and* it has been tested). I'll take
: his weighting algorithm (size/(sqrt(cpu_time)*sqrt(sqrt(run_time)))), but
: add my warning shot, and convert it to a more recent kernel (2.3.10). Too
: bad that we don't have a free signal for SIGMEM at hand ;-).

Yes, too bad ;) Feel free to substitute something better for Rik's
algorithm if it comes along. Just so far I haven't seen anything.

I'm just very egocentrically looking at things and commenting at anything
that could affect my situation.

Claus

-- 
claus.fischer@intel.com   Intel Corporation SC12-205 ... not speaking
phone   +1-408-765-6808   2200 Mission College Blvd.           for Intel
fax     +1-408-765-9322   Santa Clara, CA 95052-8119

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/