Re: WinModem sneaked on my table

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hermann Himmelbauer: "Re: strange problem in X...commonalities"
Previous message: Rajeev Atluri: "Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10"

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Fun it may be, but a big job and perhaps leading to legal liabilities.
> (Writing a non-approved driver and distributing it freely, plus patent
> issues on the modem protocols).

You should be able to implement everything up to v.32 (9600bps) without
patent problems. I also believe v.42bis is unencumbered. MNP5 might be
encumbered.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hermann Himmelbauer: "Re: strange problem in X...commonalities"
Previous message: Rajeev Atluri: "Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10"