Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2))

Jeff Merkey (jmerkey@timpanogas.com)
Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:55:42 -0600


Do these affect the rest of us? Does this mean I will need to make yet more
changes for 2.3 over what I'm doing for dentries in 2.2? Sorry I was late
getting to the party, but I suppose I can work late nights to get caught up.
Please Advise.

Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>
To: Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>; Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>;
<chris@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk>; <bk@suse.de>; <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2))

> On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 03:17:16PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> ....
> > OK. I'll wait for a week for the new 2.3 page cache to stabilise then
> > fold them in: hopefully I'll have a jfs snapshot out of the way too by
> > then. Once the vfs is open for new diffs again I'll do the ext2
> > superblock locking diff too.
> >
> > --Stephen
>
> Good, and I will start in earnest to get the 64-bit file issues
> folded in at the same time.
>
> /Matti Aarnio
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/