>
> As for the opening with no permissions - well, it would make *big* sense
> if we could narrow down the API and move chown(), chmod(), etc. into libc
> leaving f-variants in the kernel. Binary compatibility... Extreme variant
> might include {set,get}sockopt extended to files and doing both *stat and
> *ch{mod,own,flags} via that. Out of curiosity - did somebody on *BSD side
> play with that?
>
Actually, instead of *big* sense, that makes *no* sense.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/