Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq

Steve Dodd (dirk@loth.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:02:19 +0100


On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 11:17:36PM +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:

> It would be not so bad idea to grep kernel for do_bottom_half.
> You found only one place, there exist at least two more 8)8)

*dons paper bag and hits himself with a clue-by-four*

> BHs are run not between tasks, they are run not depending on tasks
> and in parallel with tasks. Does it answer to your question?

Yup, I was talking crap again - sorry. So the bh is run both in and out of
interrupt context, in which case we do need the spin_lock_irq(), yes? Actually,
don't we only need to disable the bottom half on the local cpu?

-- 
"Water?  Never touch the stuff!  Fish fuck in it."
                -- W. C. Fields

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/