>Now let's assume that we have a hacked libc (or a system-wide
>LD_PRELOAD) which intercepts the open system call.
Pushing the kernel published interfaces out to include code
that is not accountable to the kernel seems less than optimal.
____
david parsons \bi/ a hacked libc? I don't think so.
\/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/