> I've now been through most of the 2.2.7->2.2.9 diff set discarding stuff
> that seems not to be a viable candiate.
> So - are most people seeing the problems running quotas ? And would someone
> with their brain firmly wrapped around the page cache/vfs verify this change
> that was made is absolutely safe
> - if (PageSwapCache(page_map))
> - delete_from_swap_cache(page_map);
..
> + delete_from_swap_cache(page_map);
Yes it is. At least, I haven't seen anyone complaining about getting
a number of these messages on their screen.
VM: Removing swap cache page with wrong inode hash on page 0xADDRESS
OTOH, if a lot of people have been getting this message, then the
above change probably wasn't safe :)
regards,
Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/