On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:06:34 -0600, "Jeff Merkey"
<jmerkey@timpanogas.com> said:
> Bless your heart, you missed the point. Most of the stuff in NT is
> geared towards parallelism, not disk vs. cache access.
You were making points about how a particular disk/cache architecture
was good for parallelism. Linux shares many of the same architectural
distinctions, and in 2.3, we are getting _very_ good parallelism out of
the file and IO subsystems. Thanks, Ingo!
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/