Re: kHTTPd: Good or Bad
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 02:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 1999 at 02:35:00PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > Not everyone can just switch to apache at the drop of a hat, as nice as
> > it might be. In this case khttpd becomes very useful as a generic 100%
> > transparent httpd accelerator for *any* webserver -- think about
> > commercial closed-source ones too.
> http://www.netcraft.co.uk/Survey/Reports/199906/platform.html
> "The percentage of Apache specific servers [...] is now 61.12 (from
> 60.79 last month)."
> You'll forgive me if I'm sceptical of your comment.
You missed the point completely.
Just because something is popular doesnt mean you can (or should) switch.
Using your logic we should all dump Linux and use doze95 instead.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/