Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about

Arjan van de Ven (root@fenrus.demon.nl)
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 16:57:46 +0200


In article <XFMail.990620143910.infrared@a-b.hu> you wrote:

> My opinion is that starting to put everything in the kernel is a very-very bad
> idea. This thing startted with knfsd, now comes khttpd, kftpd, kraserver...
[snip]
> I think, the best solution for this problem would be to implement a clear
> interface which would allow loadable modules to provide such services.

You obviously haven't seen kHTTPd. It _IS_ a module, so at least your
concerns are met.

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/