Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 17:13:19 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Arvind Sankar: "bug in filesystem busy detection in 2.2.x?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel compile in RH60"

> Not that I completely disagree with you, but I'm just
> curious if you think the same way about knfsd...

To an extent, but I can't think of a better generic abstraction for knfsd
unlike khttpd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arvind Sankar: "bug in filesystem busy detection in 2.2.x?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel compile in RH60"