Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)
H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 03:50:15 -0700
Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Trivially: it's the module installer's job. (Actually, dynamic devices
> > are bad, this one of the major reasons why.)
>
> dynamic devices are good, and even if they aren't, there are lots of
> them out there, and there's going to be more. Personally what I would REALLY
> like to see is the ability to remove/replace a scsi disk in a system while
> the system is running. Don't know if devfs supports it (Or PC hardware in
> general, but I think it does).
> This would assist me greatly in keeping servers up and happy and
> handling user requests. That ability, and raid0+1 make a powerful
> combination for very high reliability.
>
> Stephen
Alright, clarification: what I meant with "dynamic devices" is dynamic
device numbers. Hotpluggable devices are obviously a good thing.
-hpa
--
"The user's computer downloads the ActiveX code and simulates a 'Blue
Screen' crash, a generally benign event most users are familiar with
and that would not necessarily arouse suspicions."
-- Security exploit description on http://www.zks.net/p3/how.asp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/