So the questinon was is the driver still in development or not? If not
then shouln't the kernel config be modified? If it is still in develpment
then the howto should be modified to reflect this.
Joe
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Joe wrote:
> > I was reading the documentation for the Linux kernel framebuffer
> > device and it said "IMPORTANT: For 2.1.x kernels, go into the
> > Code Maturity Level menu, and enable the prompt for development
> > andor incomplete drivers. This is no longer necessary for the
> > 2.2.x kernels."
>
> For x86 and Alpha, I would say that vesafb and matroxfb are pretty
> stable, atyfb (ATI) mostly stable, but the others are either not stable
> or simply don't support x86 platform.
>
> This is changing though ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
> P.S. A good place to address further questions would be the fbdev
> mailing list, linux-fbdev@vuser.vu.union.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/