Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)

DAVID BALAZIC (david.balazic@uni-mb.si)
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:43:55 +0100 (MET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10?"
Previous message: Gert van der Knokke: "2.2.7 LCA machinecheck..."

> Like it or not, syscall numbers *are* policy, and the kernel should
> not be
> dictating policy. Therefore. the kernel should not be deciding what
> numbers are assigned to syscalls. Q.E.D.
>
> Come on.. This has gone crazy.

Yes, but I still want to mention that the same is true
for device numbers , I just wont repeat the whole paragraph :-)

-- David Balazic , student E-mail : 1stein@writeme.com | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10?"
Previous message: Gert van der Knokke: "2.2.7 LCA machinecheck..."