Re: [OT] NTFS is fast at fsck/chkdsk NOT !

Riley Williams (rhw@MemAlpha.CX)
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 01:02:56 +0100 (GMT)


Hi Olaf.

> Adding a bit of steam, I just have this warning to those
> unfortunate fellows who still need to run NT: don't boot NT with
> a ZIP disk in the drive. I did this once with an almost emtpy
> disk (VFAT fs, of course) and gave up after ~15 min of chkdsk
> (or however this is called today). Flip the switch (of course
> IBM still don't think a reset button is useful :-P), eject the
> disk, all is fine. No FS errors.

I remember reading somewhere about patches for both Win9x and WinNT to
deal with this problem. As far as I can recall, the patch makes WinXX
treat a ZipDisk as a floppy drive as far as bootup is concerned, so it
doesn't consider running chkdsk/scandisk on them...

Mick: I believe you grabbed the Win9x version, but do you know
anything about a WinNT version?

Best wishes from Riley.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/