Re: Speeding up fsck 2 times

Pavel Machek (pavel@bug.ucw.cz)
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:06:54 +0200


Hi!

> > I do not know if I should attempt official kernel integration. I
> > probably can make it per mount option pretty easily.
>
> If you can show with actual benchmarks how much slower is the worst case,
> and if the slow down isn't too bad (or is inexistant), then it should
> definitely be integrated.
> We just have to come up with the worst case and a benchmark for it so we
> can try it on various configs. Is linear access to a big
> file the worst case ? Isn't there something worse ?

mj thinks random access is the real worst case. No, I did not do the
benchmarks. Too much memory and not enough unpartitioned hdd space,
here ;-).

Pavel

-- 
I'm really pavel@ucw.cz. Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel.  Pavel
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/