Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
14 Jun 1999 12:03:49 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brian: "2.2.9 panic"
Previous message: Arjan Filius: "pre-2.3.7-2-d OOPS"
Maybe in reply to: Ricardo Galli Granada: "Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"
Next in thread: Dirk Nuyens: "Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"

In article <linux.kernel.E10tYUA-000676-00@the-village.bc.nu>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> the patch to 2.2.10 seems to be wrong in line 1764 (at least the
>> one from www.fi.kernel.org):
>>
>> -- Some video cards have problems with Accelerated X 4.1
>> \ No newline at end of file
>> +- Some video cards have problems with Accelerated X 4.1
>
>The patch is fine. You need to get a non prehistoric version of the
>patch program (eg patch v2.5)
>
>[and before Orc gets going, yes you can build patch v2.5 with libc4]

Well, I would hope so, because I've been doing that.

____
david parsons \bi/ though I hope that patch 2.0 is good enough, since
\/ that's the one I've been shipping.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brian: "2.2.9 panic"
Previous message: Arjan Filius: "pre-2.3.7-2-d OOPS"
Maybe in reply to: Ricardo Galli Granada: "Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"
Next in thread: Dirk Nuyens: "Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"