Re: [OT] NTFS is fast at fsck/chkdsk NOT !

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: egcs-1.1.2 ping bug also causes miscompilation of pcbit isdn driver"
• Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: size of pid_t (was: Re: NR_TASKS as config option)"
• Maybe in reply to: DAVID BALAZIC: "[OT] NTFS is fast at fsck/chkdsk NOT !"

>DAVID BALAZIC writes:
>> Who said that NT with NTFS recovers fast from corruptions ?
>> Who said is fscks ( chkdsk actually ) fast on boot ?
>>
>> I don't know what setup they are using , but on a NT4SP4 box here
>> a chkdsk lasts just as long as it would a fsck on ext2.
>
>The only reason you are seeing chkdsk run is because your filesystem
>is FAT based, not NTFS. chkdsk never runs on an NTFS filesystem.
>Check your facts a little more carefully before posting.

I rechecked it , bot explorer properties and WinNT Diagnostics
say that it is NTFS. ( drive C: , the only one )

--
David Balazic , student
E-mail   : 1stein@writeme.com     |     living in  sLOVEnija
home page: http://surf.to/stein
Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT
--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/






 Next message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: egcs-1.1.2 ping bug also causes miscompilation of pcbit isdn driver"
 Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: size of pid_t (was: Re: NR_TASKS as config option)"
 Maybe in reply to: DAVID BALAZIC: "[OT] NTFS is fast at fsck/chkdsk NOT !"