Re: generalizing khttpd

Bjorn Wesen (bjorn@sparta.lu.se)
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:13:02 +0200 (MET DST)


On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> same can be achieved by running RT userspace code). This is why things
> like sys_copyfile() or sys_movedirectorytree_atomically() would be a good

what about sendfile() for copying ? or rename() for moving a directory
tree ? if rename() can't do it, you're on different filesystems and that'd
require locking both. hairy..

> idea, i.e. doing things in atomic manner and without too many mode
> switches. In the same manner (assuming gzip is de-facto standard of
> compression, which it is) it would be nice to say sys_gzip("file",

that's why you have libraries. "nicety" has little to do with the kernel.

> program". One can treat khttpd as a "kernelspace application", perhaps a
> revolutionary and a unique (until all other vendors start shipping

that's why I suggested the "low latency services" as something between
kernel and userland, if this is deemed necessary.

/bjorn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/