Re: khttpd

felix@convergence.de
10 Jun 1999 13:29:16 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.2.10pre3] fs/Config.in fix and cleanup"
Previous message: naughton@poweronline.net: "booting secondary kernels"
In reply to: Alex Belits: "Re: Preparations for ZD's upcoming Apache/Linux benchmark"

In local.linux-kernel, you wrote:
> Why not give khttpd a devoted port? Why go to all these pains to dissect
> keep-alive connections and all that, when we can do <IMG
> SRC="http://my.server.net:81/banner.gif">? Is that just too easy for
> everyone? Is it because the benchmarks we were talking about would be able
> to use something like that?

Recent squid versions disallow port 81 through the proxy, so people will
see broken images.

Felix

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.2.10pre3] fs/Config.in fix and cleanup"
Previous message: naughton@poweronline.net: "booting secondary kernels"
In reply to: Alex Belits: "Re: Preparations for ZD's upcoming Apache/Linux benchmark"