> > > I would have to say for the most part, but I did find some printk's that had
> > > "SHIT:" in them =)
> >
> > if you check out the context of those printk's than you'll see that they
> > 'never happen'. And we are allowed to 'never printk profanities', arent
> > we? ;)
>
> Well, if they're never going to happen, why are there printk's
> to tell you it happened? :) [...]
because Linux sometimes even makes the impossible become possible ;)
Seriously, those are debugging messages, 'not possible' theoretically, but
a hardware (or software) bug can trigger it. (i dont think censors want to
ban PCs altogether just because it's theoretically possible to have a
hardware bug that accidentally prints 'shit' on the screen) This whole
nice piece of australian legislature clearly defies common logic.
-- mingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/