khttpd

Chris Smith (cd_smith@ou.edu)
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:23:25 -0500


Maybe this is a dumb question, but here goes:

Why not give khttpd a devoted port? Why go to all these pains to dissect
keep-alive connections and all that, when we can do <IMG
SRC="http://my.server.net:81/banner.gif">? Is that just too easy for
everyone? Is it because the benchmarks we were talking about would be able
to use something like that?

Just curious,
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/