> > > Besides, it's (a) optional and (b) localized (doesn't mess around with
> > > any other kernel code). You wouldn't want it in a machine that wasn't
> > > a web server as its main function, that's for sure.
> >
> > Or was a real world web server.
>
> You could use it in conjunction with something like Apache to handle the
> static items -- images etc. Probably would work quite well.
>
> > But how does khttpd compare to Zab's phhttpd work, which is user space ?
Could someone point me to this?
> Well, for one thing, khttpd is purely hypothetical at this point :)
Not at all. See http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/
Matthew.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/