Re: i386/RTC: old problem, new solution?

Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl)
Sat, 22 May 1999 00:04:11 +0200 (MET DST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Capabilities done right..."
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: file locking over NFS in 2.2.7"
Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Windl: "i386/RTC: old problem, new solution?"

What a strange discussion - people claiming that the BIOS
sets the Linux system clock, and that we need a kernel patch
because syslogd is started before hwclock is run.

Do you not have full control over the order in which you start
stuff at boot time? A 1-line change in some rc file would run
hwclock before syslog.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: Capabilities done right..."
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: file locking over NFS in 2.2.7"
Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Windl: "i386/RTC: old problem, new solution?"