> Wouldn't 2.3 be a really good place to switch to a newer compiler? there
> have been two releases
> of egcs since 2.7.2. (compared to kernels it is like asking people to
> use 1.2, after all egcs IS
> the new gcc now, even officially). I don't remember sticking to a
> compiler this long before,
> AFAIK we just used the most recent gcc until gcc 2.7.2 came around.
We might has well wait for gcc-2.95, it's (hopefully) only a few months away
now. Though I still don't understand why it's gcc 2.95 and not 2.9.0 ...
--
"Water? Never touch the stuff! Fish fuck in it."
-- W. C. Fields
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/