Re: 2.3.x wish list?

Michael H. Warfield (mhw@wittsend.com)
Mon, 17 May 1999 15:19:17 -0400 (EDT)


Michael B. Trausch enscribed thusly:
> On Thu, 13 May 1999, G. Sumner Hayes wrote:

> > mark@hoist.nlcomm.com wrote:

> > > 40-bit encryption isn't. Why not just put 40 bit as the default
> > > in the kernel, but require patching to get any higher.

> > Any encryption is illegal for export from the US without a license.
> > Licenses are routinely granted for export of binaries that only use
> > 40-bit crypto, but AFAIK they aren't granted for source code at all
> > (barring special circumstances), even with 40-bit crypto.

> > The 9th Circuit court's ruling may eventually make it legal to export
> > source code with crypto in it, but that ruling doesn't apply to
> > binaries as far as I can tell. Besides, there's still a Supreme Court

> It affects only those binaries that have source code -- the ruling is
> based on source code as a language (even though it's not a spoken language
> --- the judge rules it under freedom of speech). From what I read, the
> 9th Circuit court ruling is the law until the US Supreme Court overturns
> it -- period. And I have a feeling that it will NOT be overturned by the
> supreme court.

It's under stay pending a decision on appeal. As things stand
right now, no, it's still not legal.

[...]

Mike

-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/