> what kind of "spaghetti" is schedule() in 2.3.2 ?! :-)
> Probably there's a better way to code it without performance
> loosing
I don't think so. The reason the code is 'spagettified' is
to keep the cache footprint small and the scheduling overhead
low (although I'm pretty sure we can save a few more picoseconds
somewhere).
cheers,
Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/