Re: Why 'wait queues' and not 'channels'

Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com)
Sun, 16 May 1999 14:47:08 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: host (multibus) failover"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.3.x wish list?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: VFAT rename"
Next in thread: Malcolm Beattie: "Re: Why 'wait queues' and not 'channels'"

I agree with Dave here, except that isn't it true that broadcast events
are harder to implement with this as opposed to virtual channel events?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: host (multibus) failover"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.3.x wish list?"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: VFAT rename"
Next in thread: Malcolm Beattie: "Re: Why 'wait queues' and not 'channels'"